The Trigger
Picks up every application as it arrives, whether from your careers page, a job board or a referral.
A recruitment agent does the admin and the first-pass screening for your hiring team, all against the criteria you set. It doesn't decide who gets hired. Your team spends its time on the people, not the paperwork.
A single decent role can draw hundreds of applications. Someone has to read them, and reading them properly takes time. CVs get skimmed and strong candidates get missed.
Meanwhile the good people don't wait. A slow reply or a week of silence and they've taken another offer. The process that was meant to find the best person ends up losing them to whoever moved quicker.
A recruitment agent does the reading and the chasing so your team can focus on the candidates really worth meeting.
Every recruitment agent we build is designed around how you hire. The work usually runs in three stages, each one shaped to your criteria and your process.
Picks up every application as it arrives, whether from your careers page, a job board or a referral.
Reads each CV against the criteria you set and scores it on fit, the same way for every candidate.
Hands your hiring team a ranked shortlist, with the reason for each candidate's score attached.
We don't fit you to a template or hand you a product to switch on. Each agent is designed and built around your process, then run for the jobs you need doing.
These aren't products to choose from. They're examples of what an agent could do, each one designed and built around how you hire.
This could look like an agent that finds candidates who match the brief and opens the conversation.
A warm pipeline, without the manual search.
We might build this as an agent that reads every application against your criteria and ranks what comes back.
A ranked shortlist, with nothing lost in the pile.
An agent at this stage could handle the back-and-forth that slows a hire down.
A process candidates don't drop out of.
An agent that keeps every role moving and flags the ones that have stalled.
A pipeline you can see, not chase.
Picture a hiring manager with five roles open and around 300 applications landing each week.
~300 applications a week
Skimmed by hand, a couple of minutes each
Around 10 hours gone, and strong CVs still missed
All 300 screened as they arrive
Ranked against the manager's criteria
A shortlist of about 20 to review
Closer to an hour, spent deciding not sorting
Same 300 applicants. Ten hours of skimming becomes about an hour of deciding, and the strong candidates sit at the top instead of buried in the pile.
Figures are illustrative.
No. It screens and ranks against the criteria you set, and a person makes every hiring decision. You decide what it looks at and where the bar sits, and it shows its reasoning for each candidate, so the call is yours and you can see how it got there.
You set the rules, and you can change them whenever your priorities do. The agent then applies them to every candidate the same way, which is hard to guarantee when CVs are skimmed by hand under time pressure. Set up properly, that makes the process more even-handed than a rushed reader, not less: it weighs everyone against the same standard and records the reasoning, so each decision is easy to review and stand behind.
Yes. We connect it to your careers page, job boards and applicant tracking system during a Discovery session, so candidates and decisions stay in the tools your team already works in.
Your agent runs in an isolated Azure tenancy, on infrastructure built and managed by Synextra, our parent company, who have spent many years running Azure for governance-led businesses. Candidate data is handled in line with your own policies.
Tell us how you hire today and where it slows down. We'll look at whether an agent fits, and show you what it would do with the work.